北大夏令营自荐信

下面是小编为大家整理的北大夏令营自荐信,供大家参考。

第一篇：北大夏令营通知

关于举办2014年全国优秀大学生夏令营”活动的通知

发布时间:2014-04-28 阅读次数:4292

为了促进我国高校优秀大学生之间的交流，增进青年学生对化学学科学习和研究的兴趣，北京大学化学与分子工程学院（以下简称北大化学学院）从2014年开始举办每年一度的“全国优秀大学生夏令营”活动。几年来，这项活动逐步成为全国高校优秀大学生了解北大化学院的重要途径，受到各地大学生的广泛关注。作为北大化学学院在“2014国际化学年”组织的一项重要活动，北大化学学院2014年“全国优秀大学生夏令营”活动将于2014年7月7日到7月9日在北京大学举行。本次夏令营活动拟招收营员230人，北大化学学院自即日起受理营员报名申请。

2014年夏令营的主要活动包括：1) 北大化学学院各二级学科（研究所、研究中心）负责人向营员介绍本学科的历史、现状与发展趋势并回答营员提出的相关问题；2) 组织营员参观重点实验室并与在学本科生、研究生座谈、交流；

3) 北大化学学院在营员中进行本院2014年免试研究生选拔工作（具体的笔试、面试安排等信息以及北京大学化学院2014年研究生招生信息随后发布）。

除来自北京地区高校的营员需自行解决住宿问题外，北大化学学院为所有营员免费提供夏令营期间在京的食宿，并为来自外地学校的学生凭票报销往返硬座火车票。

为方便同学们报名申请，现将本次夏令营活动的有关事项通知如下。

一、申请资格

申请营员的同学须同时具备以下条件：

1、大学在校三年级（2014年毕业）学生；

2、对化学领域的科学研究有浓厚的兴趣；

3、本科前两年半学习成绩在全年级排名居前20％（在其他方面有突出表现的学生可以适当放宽排名限制），必修课成绩均为及格以上，英语水平良好。在录取营员时，优先考虑综合性大学化学专业的学生及有志于进行与材料、物理、生物等交叉学科研究的学生。

二、申请材料

申请材料包括以下3类：

1、申请表、个人陈述、专家推荐信2封；

2、成绩单（可自己打印，如有不实将取消录取资格）与总评成绩排名证

明；

3、其它证明材料（体现个人学术水平的有代表性的学术论文的复印件，各类获奖证书复印件，英语四、六级证书复印件等）。

三、申请材料的寄送、审核及营员的录取

申请材料要统一使用a4纸；要把申请材料装入a4大信封；信封正面写清申请者姓名、所在学校及院系。

所有申请材料应于2014年6月10日前寄到（建议使用有寄达通知的邮寄方式）或送达北京大学化学学院研究生教务办公室。申请材料的审核及营员的录取工作由北大化学院夏令营委员会负责。营员录取名单将于2014年6月20日前在北大化学院的主页上公布。营员录取通知以e-mail形式直接发给申请者本人。届时未接到录取通知的同学皆为未入选者。未入选者不再另行通知。

欢迎踊跃报名申请，欢迎来电来函咨询！

咨询电话：010-6275-1713 李老师

夏令营信箱：chemjw2@pku.edu.cn

材料邮寄地址：北京大学化学学院研究生教务办公室李娜老师收邮编100871

特此通知。

北京大学化学学院

2014年4月28日

附件1： 申请表.doc

附件2：个人陈述表.doc

附件3：专家推荐信.doc

第二篇：北大夏令营导师推荐

推荐信

尊敬的北京大学信息科学院领导：

你们好！

在这里我将我最优秀的学生侯道海同学推荐给贵校。侯道海同学知识技能过硬，有着较高的科学文化及道德品行素质。我希望这封信可以让贵校更好地了解学生的实际情况，并能够让侯道海同学进入北京大学信息科学院夏令营得到锻炼，让其得到更高一层的发展，进一步走向社会，建设社会。

最早接触侯道海同学时，他留给我的最大印象就是他敢说敢做的自信。“总有一天，我也可以去超越年级前三甲。”两年来，随着我对他了解的深入，我发现他真的按照自己当初的誓言去做——将自己培养得更好。每次他取得一点微小的进步，都会无比高兴，并将这种进步的喜悦转化为不竭的动力。在他的眼神中，透露出一种优秀战略家所具有的高度自信，一种让人心生敬畏的自信。

而更难得的是，这样一个自信的学生，做起事来按部就班，一丝不苟。他把活动的每一条都列的非常详细，但又不至于繁琐，让每个人的职务逐条细化，使得活动开展的效率非常高。

其实，在这个学生身上还有一个闪光点，就是他纯净的灵魂。他的兴趣非常广泛：数学、物理、书法、信息、绘画、阅读、写作等等。每次校园举行艺术节、文化节，他都要上交作品，最高的一次他一个人便揽下了四个项目，而且全部获奖，在校园展出，被班里的同学亲切地称为“才神爷”。

不得不说，这个学生的身上真的有许多一般人所不具备的品质。我相信，如果得到更好的栽培，这个学生的才能必将更好的施展。我衷心的祝愿他可以通过贵校的选拔，也希望贵校能给他一次机会。

此致

敬礼

2014级11班

班主任：

年月日

第三篇：北大保研夏令营申请表

health care financing and management

syllabus, spring 2014, yan feng

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

health care financing and management

hsbc business school peking university instructor: feng, yan

room407, building c, hsbc business school

fengyan@phbs.pku.edu.cn

class hours: april 25th to june 24th

tuesdays and fridays

3:30pm-5:20pm

classroom: c102

office hours: wednesdays 2:00pm-4:00pm, or by appointment.

teaching assistant: tbd

1. course overview arrow highlighted the prevalence of uncertainty in health care markets: physicians are

uncertain about how to treat patients, especially when medical technology is changing so rapidly; patients are uncertain about the effectiveness of medical treatment; and consumers and health plans are uncertain about the appropriateness and quality of providers’ services.

economic models explain some but by no means all consumer and producer behaviors in the medical services sector, and as for making health care policies, the economic concept of efficiency is a helpful criterion but not the only criterion for judging the desirability of alternative arrangement (e.g., distributions and redistributions). given the uneasy balance of efficiency and equality/equity, there is by no means a best health care system suitable for every society, which is especially true for a developing economy like china. in this class we will discuss why standard economic models of behavior and efficiency sometimes work and matter and sometimes do not in this industry. we are going to discuss the available information related but not limited to the following questions: do people behave in ways that are or could be made to be efficient (and equitable)? how much inefficiency is there in this industry and what are the causes? how is health care usually financed in a society? and how might a country better manage its resources dedicated to improving the health of its population?

the main context of this course is: (1) to consider the economic analysis of the medical care sector, namely how medical care is provided and financed; (2) to explore the implication of market failures in health care market such as moral hazard, adverse selection, and externality; and (3) to help you get informed with the making of health policies and how different health system evolved and developed, and also to discuss various reform ideas.

comments and questions in class are strongly encouraged. things that seem confusing or controversial are usually that way for many students; everyone will benefit if you ask questions. and because the class will deal with policy, there is a lot of room for honest feedback and constructive disagreement. no one knows the complete answer, or even the right answer, to many of the questions that will be raised in the classes. we do not set out to find the perfect answers, in different context, a solution may have quite ambiguous delivery and effect. however, if you do not think you can tolerate the fact that most of the discussion will be from the point of view of economists and will seem to be somewhat detached (that is, not from the point of view of a beneficiary or a kind-hearted philanthropist), then you probably shouldn’t be taking this class. 2. course requirements requirements ? students are suggested and expected to read all assigned readings or notes before each class; ??any submitted work should be typed, using 12-pitch font size and times new roman or arial type (no fancy fonts, please), double-spaced, and with no more than one-inch margins; submitted work can be hard copies (dropped in my mailbox before deadlime) or electronic versions, attention to english grammar and clarity of writing

are expected;

??assignments, if any, are expected to be turned in before deadline. late submission will be graded as “0” unless permission from the professor is granted in advance

under special circumstances.

coursework

there is no regular homework for this class, but you will be requested to write a term paper on a health topic that is of interest to you, it does not have to be an academic research paper. the paper should be at least 8 pages long (single-sided), but not exceeding 12 pages. you

may use materials from the class, journal articles, magazine and newspaper articles, and the internet to support your argument in your paper, but there should be no copying and pasting from the original materials. the format should be consistent with the course requirement. the deadline for turning in the paper is june 28th, 5:30pm sharp.

grading(tentative)

class participation

term paper

midterm exam (closed book)

final exam (closed book)

3. course materials 10% 30% 30% 30%

students are not required to buy books for this class. however, i do recommend 2 books as reference. coming to the classes prepared and taking necessary notes will be the most efficient and beneficial way of acquiring a broad and systematic understanding of the topics. 2

recommended books

? charles e. phelps, health economics, addison-wesley series in economics, 4th edition, 2014

??sherman folland, allen goodman, and miron stano, the economics of health and health care, prentice hall, 6th edition, 2014

in addition, “handbook of health economics”, edited by a.j. culyer and joseph p

newhouse (volume a and b, elsevier science, 2014, will be a great reference if you are seriously interested in research in health care related issues.

additional readings

readings are listed for each topic, all of which are strongly recommended for the students to master the comprehensive original discussion.

4. class schedule

due to the scheduled amount of teaching hours, in this class, we will be covering the most basic and most important topics, which include several subtopics. there may be certain topics not covered during this time period that you are interested to know, i suggest the students to find the answers in the reading materials and the books, and to utilize other public sources for updated debates regarding health care issues.

topic 1 introduction: what’s different about medical care? overview of the

health care market

readings

arrow, kenneth, 1963, "uncertainty and the welfare economics of

medical care," the american economic review 53(5): 941-973.

the demand for medical care and health topic 2

readings

grossman, michael, 1972, "on the concept of health capital and the

demand for health," the journal of political economy 80(2): 223-255.

dardanoni, valentino and adam wagstaff, 1987, "uncertainty,

inequalities in health and the demand for health," journal of health

economics 6: 283-290. (a simpler version of the grossman model is

presented in this article. you may want to read this article first).

porter, michael e. 2014, “what is value in health care?” new england

journal of medicine 363:2477-2481.3

topic 3

topic 4 mushkin, selma, 1962, "health as an investment," the journal of political economy 70(5):129-157. ellen o"brien, 2014, "employers" benefits from workers" health insurance," the milbank quarterly 81(1):5-43.financing health care: health insurance, risk pooling and moral hazardreadings pauly, mark, 1968, "the economics of moral hazard," the american economic review 58(3): 531-537.manning, willard et a1. 1987, "health insurance and the demand for medical care," the american economic review 77(3): 251-277.zeckhauser, richard, 1970, "medical insurance: a case study of trade- off between risk spreading and appropriate incentives," journal of economic theory 2(1): 10-26.rosett, richard n. and lien-fu huang, 1973, "the effect of health insurance on the demand for medical care," the journal of political economy 81(2): 281- 305.gaynor, martin et al., 2014, "are invisible hands good hands? moral hazard, competition, and the second-best in health care markets," the journal of political economy 108(5): 992-1005.ehrlich, isaac and gary becker, 1972, "market insurance, self-insurance, and self-protection," the journal of political economy 80(4): 623-648.financing health care: individual and group health insurance,

asymmetric information and risk selection

readings

akerlof, george, 1970, "the market for lemons," the quarterly journal of economics 84(3): 488-500.

cutler, david and richard zeckhauser, 2014, "the anatomy of health

insurance," in handbook of health economics, vol. 1a, chapter 11: 606- 629 only.

rothschild, michael and joseph stiglitz, 1976, "equilibrium in

competitive insurance markets: an essay on the economics of imperfect information,"the quarterly journal of economics 90(4): 629-650.

topic 5

topic 6 frank, richard g., jacob glazer, and thomas g. mcguire, 2014, "measuring adverse selection in managed health care," journal of health economics 19:829–854.financing health care: health care and the public sectorreadings cutler, david, 2014, "health care and the public sector," in handbook of public economics, vol. 4, chapter 31(except for sections 5&8).cutler, david and jonathan gruber, 1996, "does public insurance crowd out private insurance?" the quarterly journal of economics 111(2):391- 430.pauly, mark, 1974, "overinsurance and public provision of insurance: the roles of moral hazard and adverse selection, " the quarterly journal of economics 88(1):44-62.the supply of medical care: asymmetric information and agency,

hospitals and physicians

readings

goldstein, gerald and mark pauly, 1976, "group health insurance as a

local public good," in the role of health insurance in the health

services sector, ed. rosett, nber.

pauly, mark, 1995, "paying physicians as agents: fee for service,

capitation or hybrids?" in health care policy and regulation. kluwer, ed. t. abbott, ch9: 163-174.

ellis, randall and thomas mcguire, 1990, "optimal payment systems

for health services," journal of health economics 9:375-396.

mcguire, thomas and mark pauly, 1991, "physician response to fee

changes with multiple payers," journal of health economics 10(4): 385- 410.

pauly, mark and michael redisch, 1973, "the not-for-profit hospital as a physicians" co-operative," the american economic review 63(1): 87-

100.

newhouse, joseph, 1970, "toward a theory of nonprofit institutions: an economic model of a hospital," the american economic review 60(1):

64-74.

topic 7 topic 8 dranove, david, 1988, "pricing by non-profit institutions: the case of hospital cost-shifting," journal of health economics 7(1): 47-57.the market for pharmaceuticalsreadings scherer, f. m., 2014, "the pharmaceutical industry," in handbook of health economics, vol. 1b, chapter 25.grabowski, henry and john vernon, 2014, "the determinants of pharmaceutical research and development expenditures," journal of evolutionary economics 10:201-215.kyle, margaret, 2014, "pharmaceutical price controls and entry strategies," working paper.lichtenberg, frank, 1998, "pharmaceutical innovation, mortality reduction, and economic growth," nber working paper 6569.lichtenberg, frank r. and tomas j. philipson, 2014, "the dual effects of intellectual property regulations: within- and between-patent competition in the u.s. pharmaceuticals industry, " journal of law and economics 45(2): 643-672.health system reforms readings

burton a. weisbrod, 1991, "the health care quadrilemma: an essay on technological change, insurance, quality of care, and cost

containment," journal of economic literature 29(2):523-552.

cutler, david, 2014, "equality, efficiency, and market fundamentals: the dynamics of international medical-care reform," journal of economic

literature 40(3): 881-906.

diamond, peter, 1992, "organizing the health insurance market,"

econometrica 60(6): 1233-1254.

5. important dates

term paper due: 5:30pm june 28th

midterm: may 24th

final: tbd

6

第四篇：北大资源学院夏令营

2014年北大资源学院夏令营规则

为了搞好2014年夏令营活动，提高家长学生的对本次活动的认知程度，进一步提高考生对北大资源学院的认识，使考生渡过一个愉快的假期，制定本规则。

一、入营条件

1、必须是本年度的考生，必须是购卡者，否则不予考虑

2、初步人数确定为50人左右

3、购卡者必须在购卡处登记造册（考分待查询后登记）

4、原则上，只让学生入营，但个别家长要去，只准许一个家长去。俩个家长同时去的，必须有一个自费。

4、学校将根据实际登记情况，选择入营学生

二、夏令营旅行路线

新泰——北京。届时，将有巴士带领全团人员进京。考生到京，请家长和学生带好学生证、身份证等有效证件及履行必需品。

在京活动由学校负责安排。到京后，自由活动者，费用自理。

三、本规则自发布之日起实施，解释权属学校组织方。

北大资源学院欢迎你，谢谢！

qq:420145436

2014年5月7日

第五篇：北大 自荐信

(一篇好范文带来更多轻松：wwW.haOWoRD.cOm)

湛杨梦晓同学自荐材料

尊敬的北大招生办领导：

您好！

我叫湛杨梦晓，男，17岁。我来自于蓝墨水的上游，美丽的汨罗江畔。现就读于汨罗一中高三年级409班。

民主与科学，是北大高擎的两面飘扬的旗帜，也是当今学子所应坚持的。我有幸生活在这样一个伟大的时代，一个允许我们拥有自由与独立思考的时代。于是，我深深思索，怎样才能不辜负了这样的一个时代？

年少扬帆，志存高远

周恩来总理年少曾高呼“为中华之崛起而读书”。而今日之中华，不少学子却只为一己私利，企求一生无忧。倘若人人都如此，偌大的新中国又靠谁来建设？于是我始终以为社会贡献自己的力量为己任，努力提升自己的修养，严格要求自己。并且充分发挥自己外向、号召力强的特点，经常与同学们聊时政热点，做他们的思想工作，力求与他们一同进步，树立社会责任感。

在家中，我孝敬父母，体贴他们的辛苦，生活上不提过分的要求，承担力所能及的劳动。在学校，老师除了是我的师长，更是我的朋友。由于外向，我与老师关系十分融洽。生活中，我与同学和睦相处，共同进步，把自己的快乐分享给每个人。同时，我也始终放飞自己爱的孔明灯，照耀每个需要光明的人。在无情的灾难来临，伤害我们的同胞之际，我总是号召大家为灾区捐款。将自己的爱，通过这微薄的零用钱，传递给灾区人民。因为表现突出，我多次被学校评为“三好学生”、“优秀学生”，并在2014年和2014年分别被评为汨罗市级“三好学生”和“优秀学生干部”。

追求真理，刻苦求知

学习是通往真理的捷径，也是通向完美的必由之路。我享受追求知识的过程,并将学习当做一种漫游，将学习中所遇到的困难全当做沿途美妙的风景。

我是一个学得挺活的学生。我从不将学习成绩的提高寄托在题海战术之上。我甚至宁愿放弃一些容易且重复的题，而去做那些新颖的题型。学习，本就是方法的积累和应用，太多次数的重复反而毫无必要。另外，我特别爱问问题，尤其是在物理科上，除了课本上的知识，我总喜欢缠着物理老师，去了解更多的有关物理学史上的有趣事件。兴趣是最好的老师，我对理科的极大热情也换来了我理科各个科目极佳的成绩。我的成绩始终稳居年级前列。并在2014年获得湖南省高中化学联赛省级三等奖，物理、数学联赛均获岳阳市一等奖，生物竞赛荣获岳阳市三等奖。

特色发展，综合优化

从小，我就对各类科技非常感兴趣。我可以看一个人修拖拉机，看一下午，然后去思考那台拖拉机坏在哪里，并尝试用自己学到的知识来猜测造成这个故障的原因，以及这个故障该如何修复。进入高中，了解到有关半导体之类的知识，我对这样新奇的知识简直着迷了，到处找老师了解有关的知识，并尝试将自己家的收音机拆开观察构造。

同时，我的理性思维也特别强，总想用学到的知识来解释生活中的现象，当在教材里看到有关闪电的成因时，我兴奋得跳了起来。而与同学们聊天时，我也老爱聊一些从杂志或报纸上看到的前沿科学的知识。当读到先子理论、量子理性

之类的文章，我简直是想要手之舞之足之蹈之了！我也不只满足书本上的知识，我爱自己探究一些新的知识，为此，老师、同学也戏称我为“怪才”。（后文附有我的一点独到思考，拜请老师一阅。）

我深知，新时期的我们绝不能再做一味死读书的书呆子。

《哲学生活》中，着重讲了一个知识点——实践是认识的基础。作为当今社会的青年，我们又怎能闭门造车？高中三年，我不忘投身于社会实践，时时关注社会最新动态。针对汨罗市大量青壮年外出务工，家中儿童留守的现状，我忧心忡忡，走访调查，发放问卷，总结撰写了调查报告——《汨罗市留守儿童现状调查分析》。这份调查报告因为真实地反映了社会现状并且鞭辟入里地进行了分析，被学校当做研究报告的典范，并被评为汨罗市实践活动一等奖。

我对篮球十分热爱，学习之余，我总喜欢去打篮球，既能锻炼身体，又能缓解学习带来的压力。篮球是个需要人全神贯注的运动，我不仅从中感受到了乐趣，更养成了对事物要百分百投入的习惯。

除篮球外，音乐也是我的一大嗜好。我很喜欢吉他这种乐器，我觉得吉他也有性格，就是不羁，我很喜欢这样的随意。所以我开始学习吉他，而且也较有天赋，在汨罗市的艺术节上获得了器乐类一等奖。外向的性格和喜欢与人交流的特点也使我练就了非凡的口才，无论大型还是小型的演讲，我都不怯场，敢于用幽默风趣的口才去感染大家、号召大家。我曾参加“希望杯“英语竞赛，并获得老师们的好评。

而飞翔更是我年少以来的一个梦，每次看到飞机从校园上空飞过，我都希望自己也能造出那样神奇的事物。所以，我尝试着利用有限的材料开始制作。尽管学习任务比较繁杂，我总抽出时间来对自己做的飞行器进行改造与再设计。继我所参加的汨罗市青少年科技创新节“遥控飘移车竞速“赛获得二等奖后，我的飞行器也终于在我不断改造下升空，获得校一等奖。

为梦奋斗，永不言弃

我将对生活的热情，对社会的责任，对学习的热爱，化为一个美丽且充满希望的梦想，我希望北大能成为我成就梦想的舞台。“好风凭借力，送我上青天！”我多么渴望当我来敲门时，北大，您能敞开您宽阔的胸怀拥抱我！

湖南省汨罗市一中学生 湛杨梦晓

2014-12-19

附：

学虚数时，数学老师介绍，人们开始时认为有理数就可以应对所有生产应用，但却发现边长为1的正方形的对角线长度无法用有理数表示，所以数系扩充到了实数。而后来又发现核物理时要用到负数的平方根，所以数系扩充到了复数。我不禁想，当0作除数时，现在看来也无意义，那么会不会也能扩充数系？后来学导数，我意识到，可以用趋近于0的数来作除数，也就是说可以定义一种具有除法性质的0来做除数，我将这命名为“趋近数”。然后就是其实际意义了，我发现当一个对数函数的真数为趋近1时，其值是趋近0的，我们且定义x→a=a′。那么我们可以证得ln1"?0"（因为令f(x)?

f"(1)?1?

ln**

则f"(x)?

1?ln**

，所以

lim

ln(1??x)?ln1(1??x)?1

lnx

?

ln1"0"

，即

lnx

ln1"0"

。利用这个，我们就可以很简单?1）

?x?0

地得到：lim

x?1

x?1

?2，因为

lim

x?1

x?1

?

ln1"0"

?

2ln1"0"

?2

0"0"

?2

，而若按照常规

办法则必须构造一个函数然后将

lim

x?1

lnx

x?1看作是该函数在ｘ＝１时的导数来

做，显然引入趋近数将减轻类似的计算。

科学也需要创造，需要幻想。这还只是我探索的开端，现在我的知识还很有限，无法将这个想法彻底的应用到实际中，我由衷地希望能在北大——这个鼓励学子探索与追求的学府中与更多志同道合的友伴共同完善这个想法。

推荐访问:夏令营 北大 自荐信 北大夏令营自荐信 北大夏令营自荐信(精选多篇) 北大冬令营自荐信